Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Super heavies or super lame?
#17
(25-08-2015, 06:07 PM)aprilmanha Wrote:
(25-08-2015, 05:50 PM)wako1302 Wrote: True, but I am saying if you take what a normal-ish Guard List has (one that has not been modified for Knights) - Lots of Infantry, some good Heavy Support and odd flyer - it is still going to be difficult for the Knights to win - One very lucky Guardman can tie up a Knight on his own.

That would be some scary luck to avoid the CC attacks and then the 4 stomp hits as well Big Grin

Still having said that I rolled more 6's in a row a few weeks back then ever (and got a triple one this weekend)

A knight is only Weapon Skill 4.
So the D-Weapon is not always hitting. It also does nothing on a roll of 1 and the Guardsman may have a save on a roll between 2 and 5. Only a roll of 6 would be an instant kill.
Only one STOMP template could cover the Guardsman, so he would only get 1 hit. It also does nothing on a roll of 1 and the Guardsman may have a save on a roll between 2 and 5. Only a roll of 6 would be an instant kill.

I have had a single marine stand up against a Knight for 3 turns before it was killed - Once lock in combat a Knight cannot run, and therefore cannot shoot - A good tactic is to just sacrifice units against the Knight to stop it doing anything.

You can win a game of 40k with just a single Guardsman left alive.
Tyranids - They are coming! I feel then scratching inside my mind, scratching, screaming, running, so many - so, so many voices.

40k Adepta Sororitas, Imperial Knights & Tyranids
Blood Bowl Norse - Valhalla Vengeance
Flames of War US 101st Airborne
EPIC AMTL & Black Legion
Warmaster Skaven
Bolt Action US 101st Screaming Eagles
DropZone Resistance
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Super heavies or super lame? - by Sonofthelion - 23-08-2015, 10:53 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by manrogue - 24-08-2015, 09:46 AM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Agent0range - 24-08-2015, 04:16 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 24-08-2015, 04:40 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Agent0range - 24-08-2015, 06:05 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by manrogue - 24-08-2015, 07:30 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by wako1302 - 25-08-2015, 12:09 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Alpharius - 25-08-2015, 04:04 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by wako1302 - 25-08-2015, 05:25 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 25-08-2015, 04:28 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by wako1302 - 25-08-2015, 05:28 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 25-08-2015, 05:38 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by wako1302 - 25-08-2015, 05:50 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 25-08-2015, 06:07 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by wako1302 - 25-08-2015, 06:30 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by manrogue - 25-08-2015, 07:53 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 25-08-2015, 09:11 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Embolden - 25-08-2015, 09:55 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 25-08-2015, 10:10 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Embolden - 25-08-2015, 10:25 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by manrogue - 25-08-2015, 10:37 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 26-08-2015, 06:46 AM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by manrogue - 25-08-2015, 10:27 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Embolden - 25-08-2015, 10:34 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Embolden - 26-08-2015, 02:39 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 26-08-2015, 03:18 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Agent0range - 26-08-2015, 09:52 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 26-08-2015, 10:29 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by manrogue - 27-08-2015, 08:50 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)