Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Super heavies or super lame?
#15
(25-08-2015, 05:38 PM)aprilmanha Wrote:
(25-08-2015, 05:28 PM)wako1302 Wrote: A strandard-ish Guard list with a few Russes and Lascanon Heavy Weapon units would be a Knightmare for the Knights - Just too may units to deal with, even the units that could not hurt a Knight could tie it up in combat or run around just taking Tactical Objectives.

I still would not take the Russes, as that's about 30-40 less bodies to clog up the Knights gears with, and a Russ will die to quickly to be any use.

Maybe lines and lines of Guards with a 5 Melta in each squad + a Commisar in huge fearless blobs that can gun down the Mechs if they get to close Tongue

Pretty immovable though and not likely to hold more objectives then the ones in their half of the board Tongue so they have to hope they play a good card game

True, but I am saying if you take what a normal-ish Guard List has (one that has not been modified for Knights) - Lots of Infantry, some good Heavy Support and odd flyer - it is still going to be difficult for the Knights to win - One very lucky Guardman can tie up a Knight on his own.
Tyranids - They are coming! I feel then scratching inside my mind, scratching, screaming, running, so many - so, so many voices.

40k Adepta Sororitas, Imperial Knights & Tyranids
Blood Bowl Norse - Valhalla Vengeance
Flames of War US 101st Airborne
EPIC AMTL & Black Legion
Warmaster Skaven
Bolt Action US 101st Screaming Eagles
DropZone Resistance
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Super heavies or super lame? - by Sonofthelion - 23-08-2015, 10:53 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by manrogue - 24-08-2015, 09:46 AM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Agent0range - 24-08-2015, 04:16 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 24-08-2015, 04:40 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Agent0range - 24-08-2015, 06:05 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by manrogue - 24-08-2015, 07:30 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by wako1302 - 25-08-2015, 12:09 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Alpharius - 25-08-2015, 04:04 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by wako1302 - 25-08-2015, 05:25 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 25-08-2015, 04:28 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by wako1302 - 25-08-2015, 05:28 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 25-08-2015, 05:38 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by wako1302 - 25-08-2015, 05:50 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 25-08-2015, 06:07 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by wako1302 - 25-08-2015, 06:30 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by manrogue - 25-08-2015, 07:53 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 25-08-2015, 09:11 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Embolden - 25-08-2015, 09:55 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 25-08-2015, 10:10 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Embolden - 25-08-2015, 10:25 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by manrogue - 25-08-2015, 10:37 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 26-08-2015, 06:46 AM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by manrogue - 25-08-2015, 10:27 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Embolden - 25-08-2015, 10:34 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Embolden - 26-08-2015, 02:39 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 26-08-2015, 03:18 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Agent0range - 26-08-2015, 09:52 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 26-08-2015, 10:29 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by manrogue - 27-08-2015, 08:50 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)