Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Super heavies or super lame?
#13
(25-08-2015, 04:28 PM)aprilmanha Wrote: Its the same with any Fringe list that sacrifices all but one element of a force list to maximise one aspect.

Fringe lists need other fringe lists to have close games (Knights vs massed Drop pod marines for example).

Imagine fighting against a guard army that only took infantry platoons on objectives... Vs 5 knights.

The guards player would do little against the knights other then get stomped, but good luck on killing the 350-400 models in 5 turns.

I'm just not a big fan of fringe lists (even my eldar Wraith list is dull and I fitted them out with different weapons for each unit to try and make them interesting)

A strandard-ish Guard list with a few Russes and Lascanon Heavy Weapon units would be a Knightmare for the Knights - Just too may units to deal with, even the units that could not hurt a Knight could tie it up in combat or run around just taking Tactical Objectives.
Tyranids - They are coming! I feel then scratching inside my mind, scratching, screaming, running, so many - so, so many voices.

40k Adepta Sororitas, Imperial Knights & Tyranids
Blood Bowl Norse - Valhalla Vengeance
Flames of War US 101st Airborne
EPIC AMTL & Black Legion
Warmaster Skaven
Bolt Action US 101st Screaming Eagles
DropZone Resistance
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Super heavies or super lame? - by Sonofthelion - 23-08-2015, 10:53 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by manrogue - 24-08-2015, 09:46 AM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Agent0range - 24-08-2015, 04:16 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 24-08-2015, 04:40 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Agent0range - 24-08-2015, 06:05 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by manrogue - 24-08-2015, 07:30 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by wako1302 - 25-08-2015, 12:09 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Alpharius - 25-08-2015, 04:04 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by wako1302 - 25-08-2015, 05:25 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 25-08-2015, 04:28 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by wako1302 - 25-08-2015, 05:28 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 25-08-2015, 05:38 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by wako1302 - 25-08-2015, 05:50 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 25-08-2015, 06:07 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by wako1302 - 25-08-2015, 06:30 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by manrogue - 25-08-2015, 07:53 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 25-08-2015, 09:11 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Embolden - 25-08-2015, 09:55 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 25-08-2015, 10:10 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Embolden - 25-08-2015, 10:25 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by manrogue - 25-08-2015, 10:37 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 26-08-2015, 06:46 AM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by manrogue - 25-08-2015, 10:27 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Embolden - 25-08-2015, 10:34 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Embolden - 26-08-2015, 02:39 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 26-08-2015, 03:18 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by Agent0range - 26-08-2015, 09:52 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by aprilmanha - 26-08-2015, 10:29 PM
RE: Super heavies or super lame? - by manrogue - 27-08-2015, 08:50 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)