20-09-2013, 08:39 AM
Finally got my grubby mitts on the SM codex and my thoughts are:
No ignoring cover - still rolling to hit and no rule/wording that states ignore cover.
and yes 3HPs caused as the second immobilised result causes a further HP damage.
A bit late to the party, but thats how I'd play it.
No ignoring cover - still rolling to hit and no rule/wording that states ignore cover.
and yes 3HPs caused as the second immobilised result causes a further HP damage.
A bit late to the party, but thats how I'd play it.