Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum
#4
Personally, I think it loses only 2HP since the first hit means immobilised and -1 hull point, the second hit it loses a hull point and is already immobilised so that has no effect. I understand an immobilised result usually also results in a hull pt loss and hence where the 3 hp is coming from, but I think it's trying to specifically state that each 6 causes 1hp loss.

Regarding cover, not really sure, it is a hit and it doesn't specify ignores cover which a lot of things do, but it wouldn't be unreasonable for a grav weapon to ignore cover so could go either way with this one.

Why can't GW write rules properly?!
40K - Dark Angels, Dark Eldar, Necrons; Lord of the Rings - lots; Bloodbowl - Dwarves, Wood Elves; SAGA - Anglo Danes & Welsh; Guildball - Morticians, Engineers; Dropzone/fleet - Shaltari
Reply


Messages In This Thread
So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by Etched Oracle - 11-09-2013, 05:52 PM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by sprogmcjob - 11-09-2013, 06:56 PM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by jaqenhgar - 11-09-2013, 08:05 PM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by Gareth - 11-09-2013, 08:15 PM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by GoNecrons - 11-09-2013, 08:40 PM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by Embolden - 20-09-2013, 08:39 AM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by Nick1988 - 20-09-2013, 11:21 AM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by jaqenhgar - 20-09-2013, 09:50 AM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by Nick1988 - 20-09-2013, 11:22 AM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by sprogmcjob - 20-09-2013, 12:49 PM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by Simian - 20-09-2013, 01:42 PM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by Nick1988 - 20-09-2013, 07:42 PM
RE: So, the Grav-Weapon Conundrum - by Embolden - 21-09-2013, 06:53 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)