Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
'What Will Win' Games
#20
(17-03-2015, 03:18 PM)Dedwoods42 Wrote: Excellent. I'll get some other scenarios up and maybe get a few people involved.
That she is. My advice? Shoot it. Lots.

Seein as your bug is so god damn nasty (but doesnt have eternal warrior) i am going to wheel out my master of the forge who, in true Alpha legion style, is dressed as a salamander. Which coincidently means this guy has a 2++ invuln. Mwuhahahahah

+++ Centurion (200pts) +++

++ Legiones Astartes: Crusade Army List (Age of Darkness) (200pts) ++

+ HQ (200pts) +

Legion Centurion (200pts) [Artificer Weapons (5pts), Cataphractii Terminator Armour with Combi-bolter and Power Weapon (35pts), Combat Augment Array (35pts), Cyber-familiar (15pts), Dragonscale Storm Shield (5pts), Rad Grenades (10pts), Thunderhammer (10pts)]
····Rules: Artificer Weapons, Consul, Independent Character, Legiones Astartes
····Consul (35pts) [Forge Lord (35pts)]
········Rules: Battlesmith
····Profiles:
········Forge Lord: Unit Type:Infantry (Character)|WS:5|BS:5|S:4|T:4|W:2|I:5|A:3|LD:9|Save:2+|HH:LACAL p17
········Cataphractii Terminator Armour: Description:Affords a 2+ armour save and 4++ Invulnerable save, Slow and Purposeful, Bulky, may not perform sweeping advance. Models in a unit joined by a model in Cataphractii Terminator Armour do not have the Slow and Purposeful rule conferred on them, contrary to the usual application of the rule, but must remain in coherency with the joined character while they stay with the unit (which may limit their distance moved overall, consolidation moves, etc.)|HH:LACAL p91
········Cyber-familiar: Description:A Cyber-familiar adds +1 to its owners Invulnerable save (to a maximum of 3++) or provides an Invulnerable save of a 6++. In addition they allow the owner to re-roll failed characteristic tests other than Leadership tests and failed Dangerous Terrain tests. |HH:LACAL p89
········Dragonscale Storm Shield: Description:Confers a 5++ invulnerable save or increases existing invulnerable save by +1. May never claim the extra attack for having two close combat weapons. |HH:LAICL p65
········Rad Grenades: DescriptionBig Grinuring a turn in which a unit equipped with Rad Grenades assaults or is assaulted, the enemy unit(s) suffer a -1 penalty to the Toughness until the end of the Assault Phase. This does affect the victim's Instant Death thresholds. |HH:LACAL p84

+ Legion +

Legion Astartes [XVIII: Salamanders]

++ Selection Rules ++

Artificer Weapons: Character with this upgrade may give a single weapon Master-crafted. (HH:LAICL p65)
Battlesmith: If a Battlesmith is embarked on or in base contact with one or more damaged vehicles during the shooting phase, they may attempt to repair one of them instead of firing a weapon. To attempt, roll a D6. On a result of 5+ the Battlesmith may do one of the following:

- Restore a lost Hull Point
- Repair a Weapon Destroyed result
- Repair an Immobilised result

If a Weapon Destroyed result is repaired, that weapon may be fired in the following shooting phase. The Battlesmith cannot use this ability if he has gone to ground or is falling back. (HH:LACAL p81)
Consul: (HH:LACAL p16)
Independent Character
Legiones Astartes: - Units with this special rules may always attempt to regroup regardless of casualties.
- Additional rules conferred by Legiones Astartes (____) (HH:LACAL p80)

Created with BattleScribe (http://www.battlescribe.net)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
'What Will Win' Games - by Dedwoods42 - 05-03-2015, 02:12 PM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by Alpharius - 14-03-2015, 11:11 PM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by Fitz - 15-03-2015, 09:36 AM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by Dedwoods42 - 15-03-2015, 10:32 AM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by Fitz - 15-03-2015, 09:23 PM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by Alpharius - 16-03-2015, 07:28 AM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by Dedwoods42 - 16-03-2015, 01:52 PM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by Alpharius - 16-03-2015, 05:36 PM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by Dedwoods42 - 15-03-2015, 09:32 PM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by Dedwoods42 - 16-03-2015, 05:39 PM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by manrogue - 17-03-2015, 10:34 AM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by Dedwoods42 - 17-03-2015, 10:35 AM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by Alpharius - 17-03-2015, 12:24 PM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by Dedwoods42 - 17-03-2015, 12:28 PM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by Alpharius - 17-03-2015, 01:17 PM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by Dedwoods42 - 17-03-2015, 01:19 PM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by Dedwoods42 - 17-03-2015, 02:06 PM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by Alpharius - 17-03-2015, 03:16 PM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by Dedwoods42 - 17-03-2015, 03:18 PM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by Alpharius - 17-03-2015, 05:26 PM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by Alpharius - 18-03-2015, 07:48 AM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by Fitz - 18-03-2015, 10:00 AM
RE: 'What Will Win' Games - by Dedwoods42 - 18-03-2015, 11:23 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)